“It is a system, stupid!”
How systems thinking could have prevented the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
Descartes and Newton believed that the parts explain the whole. Imagine eating at a three-star Michelin restaurant and having just tasted the most wonderful dish. You know the restaurant owner, and you beg her to introduce you to the chef. And the chef tells you the exact composition of her masterpiece: to the gram, the precise amount of each ingredient you need to re-create the dish. But would you really be able to? No, because cooking is a system.
What is a system? It is a set of interconnected dimensions that yield a situation, a state. This state is not determined uniquely by the simple stacking of different dimensions but by the dynamic relationship between them. You have the ingredients, precisely weighted: will their combination uniquely yield one dish? No. The order in which you add each ingredient can be different (in a system, the sequence of events matters), and so are the different states you add them (should I whisk the cream first? separate the eggs? melt the dry yeast?).
A parent receives Alice’s grades card. She got a B- in Math. Should they be proud? It depends because the parent, Alice, and her school form a system — or in this case, a system of systems — where interconnections that link the system’s agents yield B- in Math. B- is the result of the state of…
